Phones will constantly be an essential tool we use in everyday life, but not letting them become the glue that holds a relationship together is essential.If you've seen "The Notebook," you'll know that Noah hung off of a ferris wheel to ask Allie on a date.
Yet, to date, there has been a minimal response by sociologists to seek, describe and understand this influence.
In this article, we present some of the key findings of our research on online dating in Australia, in order to foster a debate about the sociological impacts on intimacy in the postmodern world.
When it comes to love, our generation wins the award for being the most confused.
With the rise of Tinder, online dating, and the “talking” stage, there is little room for what dating means and what a real date is.
“I think we all want someone to come home to at the end of day,” said University of South Florida freshman Kathryn Cound. Want sex without commitment or any inkling of emotional attachment?
“We want someone to share [our stupid thoughts] with and we know we do, but the society we live in today holds us back with fear of heartbreak and being left in the dust.” We live in a world where everything we want presents itself to us instantaneously. There’s an app for that and it rhymes with the word “hinder.” With instant gratification, why put in the time and effort in a relationship when we can painlessly have anything and everything we want?To be fair, our whole lives we’ve been discouraged from pursuing serious relationships.“You’re too young to be so serious with [insert significant other’s name],” our parents insisted.Based on a web audit of more than 60 online dating sites and in-depth interviews with 23 users of online dating services, we argue that recent global trends are influencing the uptake of online technologies for the purposes of forming intimate relations.Further, some of the mediating effects of these technologies – in particular, the hypercommunication – may have specific implications for the nature of intimacy in the global era. These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different.With this evidence, why would we ever try to look for something more serious?